solidworks associate certification experience

nothing you can’t get thorough with experience though. It’s possible to force solidworks to let you design top down using layout sketches, but it’s not built for that and might cause preformence issues and need workarounds in certain cases. Solidworks on the other hand is built to design “bottom up”, meaning that each small component makes up the bigger assembly. Onshape is built to design things “top down”, meaning the smaller components all derive from one big assembly.

Solidworks generally requires better hardware to run properly Version control is worse in solidworks, and it can be surprisingly easy to lose progress if you’re not sure what you’re doing(e.g renaming a file the “normal” way, moving a file, etc.) I can think of maybe 3 big cons you’ll feel: The best way to prepare yourself is not learning a specific tool, but knowing where/how to use them. Pick your CAD software based on what enables the students on your team the most right now, since the tools of the future probably haven’t been created yet. You’re going to have to learn the tools of your job in the future no matter what make your FRC experience one that you can collaborate, learn, and ask questions the most in.

She knew nothing about CAD or machining or software or any engineering anything, but she knew how to learn and ask questions. My mom started off as a High School biology teacher, but then transitioned to Aerospace Engineering in her mid-40s. Like I mentioned above, what is more important than your CAD software is knowing good fundamental design principles. What I’ve always been taught is that FRC teaches you how to learn, how to ask questions, and how to think. There are so many parts of FRC that are not industry standard that you aren’t going to walk into the workplace and know everything. In my opinion, what is “industry standard” shouldn’t be what you base your team’s decision off of. That had a big impact on my teams decision

Solidworks associate certification experience